May 29, 2021 | By Claire Edwards | FOR LIFE ON EARTH | Source
A note to the kids just out of university who are employed to attack truth via so-called “fact-checking” sites
established by profit-driven corporate entities:
Before retiring, Claire Edwards spent 18 years as a UN editor, which entailed checking every fact in UN parliamentary documentation and publications. This makes her a professional fact-checker, which is why she always provides full references for all her factual statements in her articles. She believes that it is vital to adhere to the truth and provide supporting evidence.
“They’re now targeting the children. On 10 May 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which granted the Emergency Use Authorizations for these unlicensed non-vaccines … Did you just read that? UNLICENSED. Let me say that again:
UNLICENSED NON-VACCINES ARE TO BE GIVEN TO CHILDREN
… The FDA announced that they are now authorizing the Pfizer non-vaccine for use for children ages 12 and up. No longer 16 and up, but 12. The very next day, a friend in the US received a notice from her daughter’s school that they will be opening up a school campus to allow the kids 12 and up to come and get their non-vaccine.
On 19 May 2021, America’s Frontline Doctors and parents launched a legal case against the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the FDA and other agencies, seeking to prevent the expansion of the EUA of COVID-19 vaccines from including children under 16 years old.
Children are already dying from these non-vaccines. By 13 May 2021, at least 5 deaths had been recorded among children in the US following Covid injections, including a 5-month-old baby who was not injected, but was breastfeeding from her mother who was. One 15-year-old girl, two 16-year-olds and a 17-year-old all died within days of receiving the non-vaccine, and another 17-year-old committed suicide 8 days later. By 26 May 2021, it was being reported that 18 teenagers in Connecticut, US, had been hospitalised for heart problems.
Let us be very clear about this. There are NO DATA on the use of these non-vaccines on children. Let me repeat that:
THERE ARE NO DATA ON THE USE OF THESE NON-VACCINES ON CHILDREN – NONE, NADA, ZILCH, ZERO
“The safety and efficacy of the vaccines in children and adolescents under 18 years of age have not yet been established.” This is the case for Moderna, Astra-Zeneca and Janssen for which “no data are available“. The same is true for Pfizer “in children and adolescents under 16 years of age with limited data available”.
The Doctor of Pharmacy who authored that document stated that: “People who are vaccinated as part of ongoing or future studies (such as children, pregnant women, and all populations targeted in the tables presented in the EPARs) are therefore part of research and experimental protocols.” (emphasis added)
The EPARS provide concrete information that answer the following questions unequivocally:
Q: Have the clinical trials on the Covid non-vaccines been completed? A: No.
– Clinical trials have not been completed and some have not yet started
– Clinical trials are due to be completed between 2022 and 2025
Q: Are the Covid non-vaccines safe? A: We don’t know.
– Side effects from vaccines historically appear over time, and are not necessarily seen in earlier clinical trials
– Long-term safety data on the four non-vaccines are missing at this stage
Q: Is it safe to mix and match the Covid non-vaccines? A: No.– No data are available on the interchangeability of a COVID-19 vaccine from one laboratory with other COVID-19 vaccines from other laboratories to complete the vaccination schedule
Q: Is it safe for children to be given the Covid non-vaccines? A: No.– Three of the non-vaccines are indicated for use from 18 years of age, and Pfizer’s vaccine from 16 years of age [now revised downwards]
– No data on the safety and efficacy of the vaccines in children and adolescents under 18 are available for the Moderna, AstraZeneca and Janssen vaccines, and data on the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine are limited
Q: Is it safe for the Covid non-vaccines to be given to pregnant women? A: No.
– There are limited data on the use of the vaccine in pregnant women because pregnant or breastfeeding women were specifically excluded from the studies
– The official advice states: “Use in pregnant women should be considered only if the potential benefits outweigh the potential risks to the mother and the foetus.”
The media are constantly spewing out messages telling the public that the “Covid” non-vaccines are “safe and effective”. This is an outright lie for which they must be prosecuted. None of the Covid jabs can be approved because they have not concluded phase three trials. This means that they are experimental treatments that cannot be made mandatory. Despite this, in April the New Zealand government went ahead and mandated the vaccines for frontline workers. Italy made Covid jabs mandatory for all health care workers, including pharmacists, by decree on 31 March 2021.
In Europe, the injections have been given a conditional marketing authorization (CMA). In the US, they have been given an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). Both of these provisional authorizations are based on the fraud that other medical treatments do not exist. But other treatments do exist and have been proven to work (they include hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D3, azithromycin, artemisinin, Ivermectin, quercetin, vitamin C, zinc, doxycycline and macrolide). Thus the issuance of both the CMA and the EUA was fraudulent.
Under the EUA, the FDA requires these Covid non-vaccines to be labelled as follows:
“All descriptive printed matter, advertising, and promotional material relating to the use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‑19 Vaccine clearly and conspicuously shall state that:
· “This product has not been approved or licensed by FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an EUA to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for use in individuals 12 years of age and older.
Informed consent before experimentation is required by the Nuremberg Code and instruments of international law such as:
· The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 1966 (art. 7: “no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation” – absolutely no derogation from this article is permitted)
· The Oviedo Convention of 1997 (chap. II, Consent)
· The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol of 2006 (art. 25, Health),
… as well as by internationally recognized agreements on ethical medical practice such as:
· The Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights of 1998 (art. 5)
· The Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights of 2005 (art. 6, Consent)
· The International Declaration on Human Genetic Data of 2003 (art. 8, Consent)
· The International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans of 2016 (art. 8, Consent).
In violation of these international instruments, the FDA guidance on the EUA states that informed consent is not required, but that recipients should only “be informed” about the medical countermeasures (MCM) they receive under an EUA.
It should be noted that, by virtue of the hierarchy of legal norms, instruments of international law are superior to any statutes, decrees or regulations issued as part of “pandemic” regulations. Even if a decree were to impose a compulsory vaccination, by the principle of the hierarchy of legal norms, the decree would be void as it would have no legal basis.
This lady in the US with 25 years’ experience in the pharmaceutical industry expresses her outrage in this video in English with French subtitles. Pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson, an expert in infectious disease, virology and evidence-based medicine, calls vaccinating children “absolutely obscene. They are not at threat and you are putting them at risk”. He believes that “When the history of this madness is written, reputations will be slaughtered and there will be blood in the gutter”.
And why would we be giving children these non-vaccines when the Covid survival rate for children aged 0-17 (the official rate from the US Centers for Disease Control) is 99.998%?
Let me make that clearer:
A CHILD CATCHING “COVID” HAS A 0.002% CHANCE OF DYING FROM IT
The chance of a child dying of “Covid” is virtually zero. But governments and schools and health services want to pump the children full of an UNAPPROVED, UNLICENSED, EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE.
The fact that the figures for the number of US children hospitalised for Covid-19 were inflated by at least 40% shows yet again that vaccinating children is not justified.”